Mixed games like H.O.R.S.E. have long been a staple in poker for their variety and friendly table vibes. For decades, the standard order—Hold ’Em, Omaha Hi/Lo, Razz, Stud, and Stud Eight or Better—has gone unchallenged. But lately, tournament organizers are getting creative with formats like H.E.R.O.S. or S.H.O.R.E., shaking up tradition and sparking debate.
So, does the order actually matter?
🎴 The Case for Change:
-
Three stud games in a row can be confusing, especially for new players.
-
We’ve all seen someone play the wrong hand because they lost track of which game was live.
-
Breaking up stud games makes for a more dynamic experience and keeps players on their toes.
-
The “that’s how it’s always been done” argument doesn’t hold much water if variety improves the game.
🐎 The Traditional Take:
-
Purists argue that consistency is part of the appeal.
-
There’s a nostalgic charm in sticking with what’s worked for decades.
-
But even poker legend Allen Kessler has chimed in online, questioning if the old ways are really the best ways.
Bottom Line:
Poker is rich in tradition, but innovation keeps the game growing. There’s no harm in experimenting with the format—just maybe keep a quick cheat sheet nearby. If it makes the game more fun, more accessible, and more inclusive for newer players, that sounds like a win.
And if you’re really not a fan of change? Don’t worry—you can still ride your horse and buggy into the sunset.
