Home of Texas Poker News

Helping You Stay Up To Date On Poker News

Andy Stacks vs. Martin Kabrhel – Hustler Casino Live: A Frustrating Session

★☆☆☆☆

(User Rating 1/5)

The Hand: The game was played with blinds at $200/$400/$400, plus a $400 big blind ante and an $800 straddle. Andy had $569,400 in front of him, while Martin Kabrhel had $318,600. The game was winding down, with only a few hours remaining, and Andy had been down for the session. Kabrhel, as usual, was chatty, attempting to throw Andy off his game with his constant banter.

Andy reflects on the situation: “I started off this session losing some significant pots. I kind of knew in the game that I should probably take a short break and come back more focused. But I didn’t do that…I knew his whole spiel of trying to throw players off their game by constantly talking to tilt them. In hindsight now, I think it would have been best to never have engaged with him. My rhythm and focus were definitely off.”

The Aftermath: After the hand, things took a turn for the worse. Andy’s frustration was compounded when the game broke early, with some players leaving for another home game, and Martin Kabrhel claiming to leave for a meeting. Andy was confused when he noticed Nick (Airball) and Santhosh (Survana) racking up their chips, and the floorman only said, “They’re leaving,” with no further explanation. When Andy asked Professor what was going on, the response was, “Yeah, I think they’re going to a home game.”

Things escalated when Martin Kabrhel suddenly claimed he had to leave for a meeting. Andy was convinced Martin was just trolling. He continued, “He knows we know he’s not going to a meeting. He’s just saying, ‘Yeah, I’m quitting. What are you going to do about it?’” Soon after, several others, including Professor and Raymond, left, leaving just Andy, Jungle, and Rampage still in the game.

This situation became even more frustrating for Andy when he learned that Ryan Feldman from Hustler Casino Live (HCL) had informed everyone about the game breaking early, but forgot to communicate this to Andy and the others at the table. This lack of communication left Andy feeling blindsided and disrespected.

Andy continues, “I think someone needs to make a decision to let the table know at the start of the game who is leaving early and at what time, but that wasn’t done. The frustration came because this isn’t the first time this has happened to me on Hustler. There was another game I played recently where the same thing happened: a player won a gigantic pot off me, coolering me with aces versus queens, and soon after, he decided to rack up and said, ‘I have to go,’ and there’s still like two hours left of the stream. It’s really frustrating.”

Responsibility and the Impact on the Game: Andy expressed that while it’s not obligatory for a player to continue playing if they’re losing, there should be a commitment to stay for the duration of the session, particularly in a streamed game like this. He added, “There’s a lot of competition to get a seat. It’s not like a regular game where you put your name up and get called. This is a business for them, and if you leave, you’re essentially affecting the image of their business, making them look bad.”

He believes it’s fair for Hustler Casino Live to require players to commit to the full duration of the stream when they sign up, and that any early departures should be communicated beforehand. This would prevent players from feeling like the game is losing its flow and keeps the session fair for everyone involved. He also acknowledged that his focus and play might have been negatively affected by the situation, saying, “When you know the game is going to break soon, it affects people’s game. Perhaps I started to force things a bit. It’s a bad habit of mine that I need to cut out.”

In the end, Andy’s experience highlights the importance of clear communication and consistency in televised games, especially when money, business, and public image are involved.

scroll to top